{quote]For the first time in several years, the US Secretary of State will not be part of the Presidential delegation when Barack Obama visits India next month.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who has played a key role in accelerating the Indo-US relationship, will not accompany Obama during his November visit due to "scheduling conflict".
Clinton would be in Australia along with Defence Secretary Robert Gates for the 25th anniversary of the annual Australia-US Ministerial Consultations (AUSMIN).
This would be a distinct departure from the past, at least since the advent of the new era of Indo-US relationship since the Clinton Administration, that the Secretary of State would not be accompanying the visiting American President. When the Air Force One touched the New Delhi airport on the evening of March 19, 2000, Bill Clinton was not only accompanied by the First Lady Hillary Clinton and daughter Chelsea but also by his Secretary of State Madeline Albright.
Similarly on March 1, 2006 when George W Bush arrived in New Delhi he was accompanied by the then Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.
In the absence of Clinton, a top State Department official is expected to accompany the US President.
Officials acknowledged that it would be a departure from the past tradition the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would not be travelling with Obama as has been in the past.
At the same time they noted that it is mostly because of the "scheduling conflict and the host of international activities that has been going on this year."
In fact, it is Clinton, who has played a key role in accelerating the Indo-US relationship during the Obama Administration.
It is she who described Indo-US relationship under the Obama Administration as 3.0 phase of the ties between the two largest democratic countries of the world.
She is just tremendously popular in India. By just being there, she would seriously sideline him without even talking.
For her to be there and not talk would be inconsistent with her prior visits. If she visited and not talked, it would also send conflicting messages on what she has been communicating to the women of India.
If she visited and talked even one major message and it did not get media coverage because it was in the same setting as the POTUS -- and media is far less of a culprit in this regard in India but very much the comparative analyst -- it would reduce her effectiveness in the long-run. They would compare how vocal she was 'not'.
Not going is the best option.
Besides, there might be other reasons. LOL. But I think above is the real reason.
__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010 Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010