Hillarysworld

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info
TOPIC: "As Barack Obama dithers, Hillary Clinton offers a glimpse of what might have been" (Coughlin, Telegraph UK, 9/10/10)


Diamond

Status: Offline
Posts: 4567
Date:
"As Barack Obama dithers, Hillary Clinton offers a glimpse of what might have been" (Coughlin, Telegraph UK, 9/10/10)
Permalink  
 


Read @ Telegraph UK

Opinion Editorial

As Barack Obama dithers, Hillary Clinton offers a glimpse of what might have been

There is a growing sense in Washington that the party backed the wrong candidate, writes Con Coughlin.

By Con Coughlin
Published: 7:33AM BST 10 Sep 2010
As Obama dithers, Clinton offers a glimpse of what might have been; Hillary Clinton speaks at an iftar meal at the State Department in Washington;
Hillary Clinton speaks at an iftar meal at the State Dept. in Washington Photo: AFP

As America prepares to mark the ninth anniversary of the September 11 attacks, President Obama's inability to get a firm grip on the deeply emotional issues involved is raising further questions about his leadership.

For a president battling disastrous poll ratings, the announcement that a hitherto unknown Florida pastor was planning to burn copies of the Koran should have provided an opportunity to show he had what it takes. As Commander-in-Chief, Mr Obama has an unequivocal duty to protect the hundreds of thousands of American men and women serving on the front lines of their country's conflicts. And General David Petraeus, the commander of US forces in Afghanistan, had already issued a warning that Americans would be at risk from attack by Islamist extremists if the book-burning stunt went ahead.

Yet it took an international outcry from the world's leading Muslim nations before Mr Obama could be persuaded to intervene. Suddenly aware that relationships with key regional allies such as Indonesia and Pakistan were being imperilled by the publicity-seeking antics of a small-time cleric in rural Florida, the president finally made a statement. Speaking on American television yesterday morning, he appealed to Terry Jones, who leads a congregation of just 50 followers, to abandon his plans on the grounds that they would become a "recruitment bonanza" for al-Qaeda.

Mr Obama's ponderous response was in stark contrast to the sure-footed approach of Hillary Clinton, his Secretary of State. Speaking earlier in the week at a Ramadan dinner for Muslim leaders, she denounced Mr Jones's proposed stunt as "disrespectful and disgraceful".

America's First Amendment, which enshrines the right of every citizen to freedom of expression, means that the government is constitutionally constrained in how it goes about curbing such potentially inflammatory activities. In the Seventies, when the predominantly Jewish community in the Chicago suburb of Skokie asked the Supreme Court to ban a neo-Nazi rally there, the judges ruled that they were bound by the constitution not to intervene.

Even so, Mrs Clinton's handling of this latest drama has made Mr Obama look out of touch, seemingly lacking in the instinctive leadership qualities that Americans expect. Muslim sensibilities might not be top of every American voter's priorities in the wake of the recent failed terrorist plots in Detroit and New York. Indeed, many Americans, particularly those that support the Tea Party's hard-Right agenda, will applaud burning the Koran as a justifiable protest against the radical Islamist ideology that inspired the September 11 hijackers. But it is a different matter when such antics place the lives of American citizens in jeopardy.

[SNIP]

At a time when Mr Obama's political opponents are seeking to exploit, to their own advantage, the fact that the president's middle name is "Hussein", he needs to take extra care when dealing with such sensitive issues. Instead, his less-than-convincing performance has seen many Democrats come to regret their enthusiastic backing two years ago. There is a growing sense in Washington that the party backed the wrong candidate, a view that is likely to harden if, as is now widely predicted, it is humiliated in the mid-term elections. If that is the case, then once the race for the Democratic nomination in 2012 begins, Mrs Clinton can expect to come under ferocious pressure to make amends.

Full article @ Telegraph UK

 

Oh, it took this to get it? Whatever!  Anyway...  about time the DC Dems woke up.

Hillary 2012!!!!



__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010
Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010

Madam Secretary Blog at ForeignPolicy.com
Project Vote Smart - Stay informed and engaged!


Platinum

Status: Offline
Posts: 179
Date:
RE: "As Barack Obama dithers, Hillary Clinton offers a glimpse of what might have been" (Coughlin, Telegraph UK, 9/10/10
Permalink  
 


I'm not sure of the wording here. Mrs. Clinton will come under ferocious pressure to make amends? She has nothing to make amends for.

__________________


Diamond

Status: Offline
Posts: 4567
Date:
Permalink  
 

I agree. I read it in the context of the heading of the article... and say, the only "amend" can be that she may not have been interested in running for 2012... lol.  No other "amend" required! biggrinbiggrinbiggrin

__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010
Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010

Madam Secretary Blog at ForeignPolicy.com
Project Vote Smart - Stay informed and engaged!


SuperModerator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1788
Date:
Permalink  
 

I wish they would have given more details about the "growing sense" among Dems in Washington that they backed the wrong candidate. I'd like to actually hear from some of these politicians, even if they're speaking anonymously. And are they ready and willing to back the right candidate in 2012? That's what I want to know!

__________________

4145952823_2e0edce16f.jpg

Nobody puts THIS baby in the corner!


Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1695
Date:
Permalink  
 

Good point, Jen.

I think a whole bunch of the Dem knew from the get go that they were backing the wrong candidate. Some of them just lacked the guts to break away from the hyped message about Obama's "historical" candidacy. Of course Hillary's was historical, as well, being a serious, viable female candidate, but as we all know, minority males in the good ole' boy political network and MSM always trump females of any race.

Some Dems supported Hillary, sticking by her all the way to convention, knowing she had WON more votes in the primaries than any candidate had ever won. Obviously, their loyalty and courage are to be commended. But in politics, party is everything, and self-preservation (reelection) is priority one. When BO was installed as nominee, the Dems towed the party line. Well, all except for us gutsy PUMAs. We stuck to our principles and fought (and still are fighting) for justice and democracy.

I will always believe that our efforts, ongoing since 2008 - our refusal to end the conversation about the nomination having been stolen from Hillary; our continued public documentation of Barack's Bamboozling both as a candidate and as POTUS; and our ongoing documentation of Hillary's many successes - have played a role in the second guessing.

__________________
It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.... Men, their rights and nothing more; women, their rights and nothing less.  ~Susan B. Anthony



Platinum

Status: Offline
Posts: 495
Date:
Permalink  
 

is Con Coughlin a conservative or liberal journalist?


they backed the candidate with the most money and biggest listserve for selfserving reasons, to get themselves elected too NOW they may lose because of inexperienced passive Obama

__________________
Amy Dugan


Platinum

Status: Offline
Posts: 460
Date:
Permalink  
 

I think the Dem party backing of Obama and the voters seeking change just for the sake of change is a classic example of "careful what you wish for you may surely get it."

Those of us who lived through the Carter years tried to warn the younger voters of what this kind of change can bring.  Unfortunately, it is now a lesson the nation has to relearn because history was ignored...especially by the younger voters.

__________________
Don't blame me...I voted HILLARY!

http://www.barefootfoundation.com/index_en.php

http://www.savethechildren.org/


SuperModerator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1788
Date:
Permalink  
 

I was a child during the Carter years, but I was very aware of inflation. When you're nine years old and you get $1 a week allowance and the price of candy goes up, you know something's wrong in the world. I can also remember when the price of gas went up to over a buck a gallon. And then came the Iran hostage crisis... When you're in elementary school, you say the Pledge of Allegiance every day and in social studies you learn that America is the greatest, strongest nation in the world. Then you go home and watch the news and see how these horrible fanatics overseas are holding Americans captive... and for 444 days the President fails to bring them home.

Put all these things together, even if you're a kid, you figure out that the President isn't doing his job right. I'm sure there are elementary school kids today who've come to the same conclusion about Obama.

__________________

4145952823_2e0edce16f.jpg

Nobody puts THIS baby in the corner!


Platinum

Status: Offline
Posts: 112
Date:
Permalink  
 

Chief among those who need to lose their jobs is Nancy Peloser. I'll have a party and dance the jig when she loses her seat.

i'm probably of a different mindset on hoping repubs sweep out the trash in the mid terms, but honestly the best way for a gov't to run is to have a prez of one party and a Congress of the other. It's called checks and balances.

__________________


Diamond

Status: Offline
Posts: 4567
Date:
"As Barack Obama dithers, Hillary Clinton offers a glimpse of what might have been" (Coughlin, Telegraph UK, 9/10/10)
Permalink  
 


Amy Dugan wrote:

is Con Coughlin a conservative or liberal journalist?


they backed the candidate with the most money and biggest listserve for selfserving reasons, to get themselves elected too NOW they may lose because of inexperienced passive Obama



Amy,
Looks like he is a conservative going by his articles.. yet he has fairly good words there on Hillary.  Of course, most his articles are about international relations and defense power in UK, military moves by UK and US.

Con Coughlin

Con Coughlin

Con Coughlin is an expert on international terrorism and the Middle East; with the benefit of 25 years in foreign journalism, he deftly scrutinises world affairs.


 



-- Edited by Sanders on Sunday 12th of September 2010 09:41:15 AM

__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010
Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010

Madam Secretary Blog at ForeignPolicy.com
Project Vote Smart - Stay informed and engaged!
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard