Hillarysworld

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info
TOPIC: Obama’s (Latest) Social Security Whopper (fact check.org) 08-16-10


Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1695
Date:
Obama’s (Latest) Social Security Whopper (fact check.org) 08-16-10
Permalink  
 


Obama is undoubtedly trying to undo some of the damage he, Pelosi, and Reid have done to the party's chances of winning in November.  Yet another false accusation - trying to place blame on the Pubs.  I'm no defender of Pubs, but I do think it's important to keep up with the Obama lies, though there may not be enough space to do so. lol

Obama’s (Latest) Social Security Whopper

The president claims Republican leaders are as eager to 'privatize' Social Security as they are to repeal his health care law. That's not true.
August 16, 2010

Summary
President Obama claimed that Republican leaders are pushing to make "privatizing Social Security a key part of their legislative agenda" should they regain control of the House and Senate. He said this is "right up there on their to-do list with repealing" parts of the new health care law.
We find the president’s claim to be mostly false.
•    Few if any Republicans now in Congress have ever pushed for total "privatization" of Social Security. What President Bush proposed in 2005 was to allow workers under the age of 55 to invest a portion of their Social Security taxes in private accounts. Most of their taxes would have continued to go into traditional Social Security.
•    Bush’s proposal to create private accounts had so little Republican support in 2005 — when the GOP controlled both the House and Senate — that it was never introduced as formal legislation. We’ve seen no evidence to suggest the idea is any more popular among Republicans now.
•    Only one Republican "leader" is currently pushing publicly for Bush-style private accounts, as part of an overall budget plan. He is Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, the senior GOP member of the House Budget Committee. His plan currently has only 13 cosponsors, none of them in the GOP House leadership.
The president further distorted the Republican position when he claimed that the GOP plan would "[tie] your benefits to the whims of Wall Street traders." That’s not true of the private accounts Bush proposed. Those would have been invested in strictly regulated, broadly based mutual funds, much like the funds in which millions of federal workers invest their own retirement funds.

(Snip)


http://factcheck.org/2010/08/obamas-latest-social-security-whopper/

-- Edited by freespirit on Tuesday 17th of August 2010 11:57:39 AM

__________________
It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.... Men, their rights and nothing more; women, their rights and nothing less.  ~Susan B. Anthony

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard