Hillarysworld

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info
TOPIC: Tavis Smiley and Al Sharpton face off (The Progressive) 05-01-10. Sharpton defends Obama to Smiley


Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1695
Date:
Tavis Smiley and Al Sharpton face off (The Progressive) 05-01-10. Sharpton defends Obama to Smiley
Permalink  
 



This tidbit is from “The Progressive”,  the defender of ultra-liberal causes and players.  From 2008 until the present, the writers at this publication have not only sung Obama’s praises, they wrote the music and lyrics.  This article seems to be somewhat more objective than many. Obviously, Smiley is not willing to grant Obama a pass on EVERYTHING - just because of his race.

Tavis Smiley and Al Sharpton face off
By Salim Muwakkil, April 30, 2010

Criticizing President Obama is a hard sell in the black community. Even with the Great Recession wreaking havoc in every nook and cranny of African-American life, it’s not easy to get a discouraging word from black folks about America’s first black president.
And those who do utter such words often face community enmity and questions about their motives.
Blacks are intensely loyal to the first of their own, but while this strong sense of racial allegiance is understandable, it’s producing a logjam in our political culture.
Note the recent public spat between former presidential candidate and activist the Rev. Al Sharpton and Tavis Smiley, the commentator and author.
On the popular “Tom Joyner Morning Show,” Smiley told radio listeners: “A chorus of black leaders have started singing a new song, saying that the president doesn’t need a black agenda. I must have missed that choir rehearsal, because I don’t know the words to this new hymn. Do we think we can give President Obama a pass on black issues and somehow, when he is no longer in office, resurrect the moral authority to hold future presidents accountable to our concerns?”

That good question was prompted by public comments Sharpton made following a White House meeting that he, NAACP President Benjamin Jealous and National Urban League President Marc Morial had with Obama.
Sharpton reportedly said the president need not “ballyhoo” a black agenda. He argued that Obama faced political constraints and could best assist distressed black communities with a broader, race-neutral strategy.
Smiley strongly disagreed. And the feud was on.
Expecting Obama to become a “black exponent of black views” is “just stupid,” Sharpton told Smiley in one of many testy exchanges.
At the heart of the disagreement are the following questions:
Is Obama’s race-neutral approach appropriate considering the many miseries afflicting black America? Why should African-American activists stop pressing for attention to their issues just because the president now is black? Wouldn’t it have been perverse to fight for a black president just so he could ignore or downplay the desperate needs of the black community?
Those in the Sharpton camp argue he should avoid black issues lest it enflame white opposition to a point where it could cripple his presidency. If Obama pushed a black cause it would empower conservatives seeking to derail progressive legislation. Let us not forget, they note, that it hasn’t been that long since the days of Jim Crow apartheid.
What’s more, they argue, with tea partiers ominously waving their assault rifles and screaming for Obama’s political blood, now is not a propitious time for a black agenda.
Sharpton took unusual umbrage at the criticism because in some ways Smiley had usurped his traditional role. Sharpton had been the one on the outside throwing rocks. Now he is an insider and a bit uncomfortable with his new role as presidential apologist.
That’s certainly a change for the brash minister who made his name fighting police brutality and racial assaults on black victims. But it’s just one of many changes wrought by Obama’s historic ascension.

http://www.progressive.org/mpmuwakkil043010.html

__________________
It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.... Men, their rights and nothing more; women, their rights and nothing less.  ~Susan B. Anthony



SuperModerator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1788
Date:
Permalink  
 

Wasn't Tavis Smiley for Hillary during the primaries?

__________________

4145952823_2e0edce16f.jpg

Nobody puts THIS baby in the corner!


Platinum

Status: Offline
Posts: 201
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yes Tavis was for Hillary.

__________________


Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 2818
Date:
Permalink  
 

Smiley endorsed Obama very early in 2007 and supported him until Jan 2008 after Obama failed to show up at the "State of Black America."  He decided to give his support to the person more interested in African American problems--Hillary Rodham Clinton. The Obots started threatening his life and even his Mama's life.
I completely agree with him not only about Obama but the entire CBC except for Jackson Lee.  She gets a pass because along side Hillary Rodham Clinton is the only politician who is working to repeal the  Rockerfeller law.

__________________

4459303562_3f593359a2_m.jpg



Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 798
Date:
Permalink  
 

Makes me think what Pelosi told Obama, stop critizing Washington DC, stop being so negative about us on the Hill, and go after the GOP. LOL.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard