Hillarysworld

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info
TOPIC: "Palin Fails to Bring ideas" (by Howard Fineman, Newsweek 2/9/10)


Diamond

Status: Offline
Posts: 4567
Date:
"Palin Fails to Bring ideas" (by Howard Fineman, Newsweek 2/9/10)
Permalink  
 



Please forgive my bringing Keith Olbermann, but the part of Howard Fineman is worth it. Actually, Keith's editorial part is not bad either. So, worth listening.


Palin Fails to Bring ideas (by Howard Fineman, Newsweek 2/9/10)

NEWSWEEK's Howard Fineman talks with Keith Olbermann about the lack of substance in any of Sarah Palin's weekend of media stunts.

Video link

==============================

I agree with two things that Newsweek's Howard Fineman observes.
1. Her address to Tea Party movement was mostly cynical and negative. There were no positive suggestions. 
2. It is extremely cynical of Palin to suggest war as a way to second-term a presidency.

On 1 - she really did not lift American spirits in the speech. Instead, she poured more gas onto the burning rage.  Not leadership.

On 2 - It further underscored her deeply internalized cynicism.  To me, this was the worst part of her interview with Chris Wallace. It gave me an insight into her thought process that I intensely dislike.

As to Keith Olbermann, I wish he would tone down his comments. When he does tone down, I find myself conceding the points despite not wanting to do so. 

Overall the entire clip is good, although I dont think Sarah Palin will need anyone else to write her memory joggers on her palm for her. I do agree with Howard Fineman - she does give that deer-in-headlight look to the camera often when she does not have a prepared statement that is ready for response. She did that when Glenn Beck asked her about the Statue of Liberty!!  She had no real talking point for that one and that totally amazed me.

__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010
Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010

Madam Secretary Blog at ForeignPolicy.com
Project Vote Smart - Stay informed and engaged!


Diamond

Status: Offline
Posts: 521
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't agree. She uplifted the people giving them hope. She had solutions to of energy independence. She said sanctions on Iran should have been done without the delays.

She did not encourage war. In the question interview she was asked how BHO could get a second term. Expressed if there was a war as in Iran, maybe people would support him.

Also, she made it clear that this administration has distanced itself from Israel. Which was a huge mistake in the middle east.

Over and over she said that America has faced problems before and have worked them out.

These news people put in their own assumptions. Too bad

__________________


SuperModerator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1788
Date:
Permalink  
 

The problem with Sarah is that energy independence remains the only issue where she really, truly possesses the in-depth knowledge that she needs to acquire for all of the issues. She has had a full year to do her homework, yet she keeps spitting out the same tired old Republican talking points. Also, she seems to be getting increasingly nervous in front of the cameras, even when she's being interviewed by someone from Fox News. Those interviews should be a cake walk for her by now.

__________________

4145952823_2e0edce16f.jpg

Nobody puts THIS baby in the corner!


Diamond

Status: Offline
Posts: 4567
Date:
Permalink  
 

Jen the Michigander wrote:

The problem with Sarah is that energy independence remains the only issue where she really, truly possesses the in-depth knowledge that she needs to acquire for all of the issues. She has had a full year to do her homework, yet she keeps spitting out the same tired old Republican talking points. Also, she seems to be getting increasingly nervous in front of the cameras, even when she's being interviewed by someone from Fox News. Those interviews should be a cake walk for her by now.


Completely agree.  And, I really want to disagree, but cannot.  I so wish this was not the case.

Even in energy independence, I would like to hear more new substance - more discussion from her that may give insight to her depth of knowledge. 

I would like to see her sit in front of Charlie Rose for a full half hour session; he will draw out of her what she really knows and how she actually thinks.  He is excellent at it.  I am not looking for a debating panel to be posed questions [he has done that with her and two other candidates for Governor for Alaska - I recall this Charlie Rose session vividly] rather a one-on-one session in which he asks questions in his thoughtful conversational way - a place where hype and high pitch snippets of responses become out of place - and that forces the person in front to draw deep into what they know and reveal not just their knowledge, but also how they actually think - the systemic process and their deductive and inductive logic and the data and context they pull into their rationale. This can possibly give us more insight into Sarah Palin. I am just hopeful that there is more, but I am seriously beginning to doubt it.

__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010
Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010

Madam Secretary Blog at ForeignPolicy.com
Project Vote Smart - Stay informed and engaged!
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard