Hillarysworld

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info
TOPIC: "After Brown’s Win, G.O.P. Officials Weigh ‘Purity’ Test" (The New York Times - The Caucus blog 1/26/10)


Diamond

Status: Offline
Posts: 4567
Date:
"After Brown’s Win, G.O.P. Officials Weigh ‘Purity’ Test" (The New York Times - The Caucus blog 1/26/10)
Permalink  
 


nytlogo153x23.gif
thecaucus_post.png

"

January 26, 2010, 11:51 am

After Brown’s Win, G.O.P. Officials Weigh ‘Purity’ Test

ADAM NAGOURNEY

 

HONOLULU – One of the top items of business for the Republican National Committee, as it gathers amid lagoons and pools at an oceanfront resort in the heart of this city this week, is to pass a so-called “purity” resolution being put forth by some of its more conservative members.

The resolution, named after former President Ronald Reagan, would require that Republican candidates agree on at least eight listed conservative positions – like gun control, same-sex marriage and abortion financing – or face a cut-off of party money and support.

The move has stirred opposition from some moderate Republicans, and some officials in the Republican National Committee, concerned that it would have the effect of shrinking the Republican tent at the very moment when Democratic stumbles appear to be creating an opening for the party.

And here is one question that is already percolating among Republicans as they move to debate the resolution: Would Scott Brown – the Republican from Massachusetts who just captured the Senate seat of Edward M. Kennedy, and someone who is a hero these days in the party – have passed the test?

If the resolution had been in place, would the national committee have been barred from doing anything to help Mr. Brown in his campaign against Martha Coakley, the Democratic attorney general?

The argument is clearly worrying proponents of the so-called purity resolution. James Bopp Jr., the conservative Republican Party leader who introduced the motion, sent an e-mail to committee members saying that Mr. Brown would pass the “Reagan test,” and is an affirmation of his argument that a conservative candidate can win election in competitive states (or in the case of Massachusetts, Democratic states).

“We have argued that what the R.N.C. needs to do is be faithful to our conservative principles to be successful, rather than ‘moderate’ or abandon those principles, and that principled conservatives can win everywhere,” Mr. Bopp said in his e-mail to committee members. “Well, Scott Brown is a good test case for these claims. He is a principled conservative who passes with flying colors the Reagan test contained in the Reagan resolution and who won a convincing victory in Mass.”

More . . .

"



__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010
Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010

Madam Secretary Blog at ForeignPolicy.com
Project Vote Smart - Stay informed and engaged!


Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1695
Date:
Permalink  
 

Well, if the Repub party wants to continue to dwindle and weaken as they were prior to Brown's election, they should put that purity plan in place. They can be voted out just as quickly as Brown was voted into the most Dem seat in the country. They work for us. If they don't represent us well - out they go.

__________________
It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.... Men, their rights and nothing more; women, their rights and nothing less.  ~Susan B. Anthony



Diamond

Status: Offline
Posts: 1191
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yes, they should definitely look a gift horse in the mouth.no confuse



__________________

Barack/Barry:  If you're NOT LEGIT, then you MUST QUIT!!

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard