For all the talk about their disappearing 60-vote supermajority, Senate Democrats appear to be less concerned about the one seat they lost than about the 59 seats they still have.
In the wake of Republican Scott Brown’s stunning victory in the Massachusetts Senate race, Majority Leader Harry Reid and the White House have struggled to win over moderate Democrats in order to increase the Treasury Department’s borrowing authority. Thirteen Democrats — including five up for reelection in November — have defected from the White House and joined a Republican effort to end the Troubled Asset Relief Program. And grumbling Democratic senators have created a scare over Ben Bernanke’s confirmation for a second term as chairman of the Federal Reserve.
Although they still hold a 59-41 majority, Democrats are worried that the souring national mood — and the looming midterm elections — will cause more splits in their caucus and kill off their best hope in a generation of achieving far-reaching domestic policy goals.
“Look, I think that anybody that is not concerned is not paying very close attention,” Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.), chairman of the Budget Committee, said when asked about whether the party’s broader agenda is at risk. “I don’t know what could be more clear. The polls show it; our meetings with our constituents show it. But hey, we’ve got to recalibrate.”
“Having 60 Democrats and having 60 votes are two different things; I think that’s one important observation,” said Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), pointing to the need for Democrats to pick up at least one Republican vote now to overcome GOP filibuster threats. “I think the other point is that we remain committed to principles and our work, but the Republicans are now the gatekeepers to progress.”
The dynamic is not unusual. In an election year, Congress typically gets less done, as party leaders are hesitant to take up controversial pieces of legislation that could roil the electorate. And the party that is facing a bleaker election-year prognosis typically has a harder time staying united.
[SNIP]
President Barack Obama will try to regain momentum for Democrats when he delivers his State of the Union address Wednesday.
But it’s a tall order. After the Brown victory, and coupled with the losses in the Virginia and New Jersey gubernatorial races, there is a growing lack of confidence within Democratic circles over the Obama administration’s ability to control the political message more effectively than Republicans.
It's hard to imagine that the Dems can pull things together, in view of how badly they misread the mood of the public to begin with. They just seem to be clueless about the fact that Americans do not want their version of Health Care Reform, or to be in debt for the next 50 generations. The Latte libs have deluded themselves into believing their own campaign hype. They thought O would have so much star power that they would all just dance all over the moderate Dems and the Pubs. Their gross inability to actually understand how angry and worried the people of this country have become is a testament to their insular existence (associating only with like minded liberals) and to their blind determination to impose their will on the American public. After all, they are so much more worldly and sophisticated than we peasants.
In his SOTU address, I look for Obama to read the best speech of his career. He'll be as contrite as his arrogance will allow. He'll espouse his love for an America where a poor AA kid can become president (never mind that he was neither poor nor fully AA). He'll wax poetic about his dream of creating a true, lasting spirit of bi-partisanship - a dream that was thwarted by the climate of urgency to turn America around, to right the wrongs of the Bush Admin (lets take bets on how many times Bush is mentioned). He'll talk of the challenges and rewards of rearing two small, precious daughters and their dog in the WH, and how wonderful MO has been (not to mention very well dressed). Toward the end, he'll whip the crowd into a frenzy with words like "hope" and "change" - no... wait... he's beaten the hope and change horse to death already. He'll use words like "dream" and "vision", since he has been criticized for not having a vision for America. Finally, he'll present to America a person who, because of the human and civil rights offered in this country, has been able to live his dream - Introducing The Crotch Bomber.
-- Edited by freespirit on Monday 25th of January 2010 10:27:08 PM
-- Edited by freespirit on Monday 25th of January 2010 10:42:33 PM
__________________
It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.... Men, their rights and nothing more; women, their rights and nothing less. ~Susan B. Anthony
If I were a Dem in Congress, I would lead a brigade to tar and feather Dean, Pelosi, Reid and Brazille for the con job they did presenting Obama as "presidential" material.