Hillarysworld

The latest on the b.c. front:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=121393

An attorney who has been involved in several cases alleging Barack Obama isn't qualified to be president because he is not a "natural born citizen" as required by the Constitution now is asking a California judge in investigate possible fraud against the court.

Orly Taitz, who has, among other cases, one pending at the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on behalf of a member of the military wondering whether orders from Obama as commander-in-chief are valid, said the possibility of fraud is one of several concerns in the case.

"There is such a high probability of criminal acts of identity theft and Social Security fraud committed by the respondent that the undersigned requests this honorable court to use its inherent powers to order Sua Sponte an evidentiary hearing on this particular issue for possible criminal prosecution," she wrote in her latest arguments that also request the case be moved to Washington, D.C.

She noted the respondent, Obama, "has submitted himself to the jurisdiction of this honorable court and can be brought to a separate evidentiary hearing to ascertain if fraud was perpetrated upon the court by assertion of false identity, even if the underlying case is not heard or closed for one reason or another."

She also asked that the U.S. attorney's office, which has been representing Obama's interests in the case, be barred from participating "due to the obvious inherent conflict of interest."

Taitz told WND a hearing is scheduled Jan. 25, and the outcome is up to Judge David Carter. The judge earlier dismissed the case in a ruling that noted the appropriate venue would be the District of Columbia, where Obama's political office is based.

WND reported earlier when she argued to Carter that since the defendant's lawyers have admitted D.C. would be the proper jurisdiction, the case should be moved.

There's a lot more-- it's a loooong article-- but most of it summarizes what we already know; it's an overview for those who are unfamiliar with the eligibility issue.

I don't have much faith that anything will come from any of these eligibility suits, but I still plan to keep an eye on things.