Hillarysworld

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info
TOPIC: (August 11,2009) White House Objects to poster that Invokes Obama Children-Washington Post


gold

Status: Offline
Posts: 54
Date:
(August 11,2009) White House Objects to poster that Invokes Obama Children-Washington Post
Permalink  
 





Bascially, as you can see in the ad, a young  child stands next to a poster that reads: "The President's children get healthy lunches, why can't I?"

The fact that the poster mentions the president's children has been the main point of contention, though neither the children's names nor their images appear. That reaction doesn't come as a complete surprise; when Ty Inc. marketed dolls in January named Sweet Sasha and Marvelous Malia, the first lady made her objections clear, and the toy company stopped using the girls' names. The First Lady's Office declined to comment for this story.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/10/AR2009081003126.html?g=0

PH2009081003128.jpg

My feeling is that these kind of questions and subsequent analysis comes with the territory.

-- Edited by thebword on Tuesday 11th of August 2009 09:49:51 PM


-- Edited by thebword on Tuesday 11th of August 2009 09:50:30 PM

__________________


Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 2818
Date:
Permalink  
 

I think this sort of thing goes with the terriority.

__________________

4459303562_3f593359a2_m.jpg



Super Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
Permalink  
 

When Gov. Palin's young daughter Piper (and the Gov.) was made part of a 3D Full Scale interactive "art" display in NYC last year, depicting a wolf kill - everyone said "it's just art". So what if the "artist" used an exact life sized model of the 8 year old and many interacting with the "art" made her the target of the wolf kill. So what if the "art" had a high powered rifle for their interactive enjoyment - the "artist" said it was not what she intended they do with the rifle BUT if that is what they felt "artistically" moved to do - then it was all good. In the name of "art" of course.

So please - Democrat Liberals - spear us the indignation over a very vague (and yet positive) use of the President's daughters when they are alluded to in an ad poster. A poster that is to make people aware of the fact that many of our children do not have access to or the money for a healthy school lunch.


http://animalrights.about.com/b/2008/10/10/its-sarah-palin-but-is-it-art.htm

SarahPalinArtMarioTama400x380.jpg

It's Sarah Palin, but is it Art?Friday October 10, 2008Artist Dawn Robyn Petrlik has created an art installation in Brooklyn, NY, featuring a cardboard cut-out of Republican Vice Presidential nominee Sarah Palin. Visitors can hold a cardboard gun and have their pictures taken with likenesses of Palin and her daughter Piper, as well as a fake dead caribou. Petrlik explains, "Glorifying hunting is unnecessary, and a little scary for someone who would be our leader."Speaking of glorifying hunting, have you seenPalin's new tote bag, which says, "Real Women Hunt Moose"?Photo by Mario Tama / Getty Images

-- Edited by thebword on Tuesday 11th of August 2009 09:42:18 PM


-- Edited by thebword on Tuesday 11th of August 2009 11:42:34 PM


-- Edited by thebword on Tuesday 11th of August 2009 11:43:17 PM

__________________


Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 2818
Date:
Permalink  
 

thebword wrote:

When Gov. Palin's young daughter Piper (and the Gov.) was made part of a 3D Full Scale interactive "art" display in NYC last year, depicting a wolf kill - everyone said "it's just art". So what if the "artist" used an exact life sized model of the 8 year old and many interacting with the "art" made her the target of the wolf kill. So what if the "art" had a high powered rifle for their interactive enjoyment - the "artist" said it was not what she intended they do with the rifle BUT if that is what they felt "artistically" moved to do - then it was all good. In the name of "art" of course.

So please - Democrat Liberals - spear us the indignation over a very vague (and yet positive) use of the President's daughters when they are alluded to in an ad poster. A poster that is to make people aware of the fact that many of our children do not have access to or the money for a healthy school lunch.





-- Edited by thebword on Tuesday 11th of August 2009 09:42:18 PM



STAMP I didn't see anything wrong with this add.

 



__________________

4459303562_3f593359a2_m.jpg



Super Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
Permalink  
 

bump. I added the link to the source and a photo of the "art".

__________________


SuperModerator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1788
Date:
Permalink  
 

That "art" is sickening. It reminds me of a similar "art exhibit" I heard about back in 1997-ish, where some "artist" made a collage of photos of JonBenet Ramsey in her pageant dresses and titled it "Daddy's Little Whore."

As for the ad, it doesn't name the Obama children or include a photo of them or refer to them in a derogatory manner, so I don't have a problem with it. Besides, it addresses an important political issue-- the government is feeding American children unhealthy food and the children of the poor are (as always) the most vulnerable. Y'all don't want to get me started on educational equality issues, but let it suffice to say that I've read all of Jonathan Kozol's books and I even went to see him in person.

__________________

4145952823_2e0edce16f.jpg

Nobody puts THIS baby in the corner!


Diamond

Status: Offline
Posts: 521
Date:
Permalink  
 

The poster makes its point. His children are not pictured and it asks a legitimate question.

This is irony and BHO deserves every bit of it. Why are his children so off limits? Because HE said so? Everyone else's are fair game.

__________________


Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 2818
Date:
Permalink  
 

Jen the Michigander wrote:

That "art" is sickening. It reminds me of a similar "art exhibit" I heard about back in 1997-ish, where some "artist" made a collage of photos of JonBenet Ramsey in her pageant dresses and titled it "Daddy's Little Whore."

As for the ad, it doesn't name the Obama children or include a photo of them or refer to them in a derogatory manner, so I don't have a problem with it. Besides, it addresses an important political issue-- the government is feeding American children unhealthy food and the children of the poor are (as always) the most vulnerable. Y'all don't want to get me started on educational equality issues, but let it suffice to say that I've read all of Jonathan Kozol's books and I even went to see him in person.



Isn't Jonathan Kozol the man who wrote "No Children Here"  He is the man that visits the innercity and writes about their school.  He came here once not so much to write about our public school because its poor because the kids here go to one of the wealthiest schools in the State but because of the failure rate and drop out rates of the kids in our community.
He also came out to our projects and checked out our afterschool program.
I read his books and think he is wonderful.

 



__________________

4459303562_3f593359a2_m.jpg



Diamond

Status: Offline
Posts: 4567
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yes, what's good for one is good for the other... In fact, I find the poster that makes a reference to Obama's kids far tamer in comparison than the one of Palin kid where she is made part of a shooting target.

Jen the Michigander wrote:

[]

As for the ad, it doesn't name the Obama children or include a photo of them or refer to them in a derogatory manner, so I don't have a problem with it. Besides, it addresses an important political issue-- the government is feeding American children unhealthy food and the children of the poor are (as always) the most vulnerable. Y'all don't want to get me started on educational equality issues, but let it suffice to say that I've read all of Jonathan Kozol's books and I even went to see him in person.


Jen, Thank you for bringing this good author to my attention. I have added two of his books to my August reading list.  I already read through one for first time teachers and really like his writing style. The second book I have chosen is comparison of the economic philosophies of three renowned economists. I have put the book on re-segregation in schools into September reading as my August has gotten full, but hope to discuss with you once I read that. Thank you.

 



__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010
Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010

Madam Secretary Blog at ForeignPolicy.com
Project Vote Smart - Stay informed and engaged!


Super Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
Permalink  
 

Thank you Jen, I think I will be checking my library for some of his books this week.

__________________


SuperModerator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1788
Date:
Permalink  
 

Hillarysmygirl16 wrote:

Jen the Michigander wrote:

That "art" is sickening. It reminds me of a similar "art exhibit" I heard about back in 1997-ish, where some "artist" made a collage of photos of JonBenet Ramsey in her pageant dresses and titled it "Daddy's Little Whore."

As for the ad, it doesn't name the Obama children or include a photo of them or refer to them in a derogatory manner, so I don't have a problem with it. Besides, it addresses an important political issue-- the government is feeding American children unhealthy food and the children of the poor are (as always) the most vulnerable. Y'all don't want to get me started on educational equality issues, but let it suffice to say that I've read all of Jonathan Kozol's books and I even went to see him in person.



Isn't Jonathan Kozol the man who wrote "No Children Here"  He is the man that visits the innercity and writes about their school.  He came here once not so much to write about our public school because its poor because the kids here go to one of the wealthiest schools in the State but because of the failure rate and drop out rates of the kids in our community.
He also came out to our projects and checked out our afterschool program.
I read his books and think he is wonderful.

 






"There Are No Children Here" was written by Alex Kotlowitz. It's about two boys growing up in a Chicago housing project. IIRC, it was made into a movie where Oprah played their mother.

Jonathan Kozol's books include "Savage Inequalities", "Amazing Grace", "Ordinary Resurrections", and "Death At An Early Age." And yes, he travels around the country visiting schools. He tends to focus on the very rich vs. the very poor and not so much the schools in the middle like the ones my nieces have attended (the kind with 30 kids in a class instead of 15 like the rich schools or 45 like the poor ones). He might have checked out the afterschool program because "Ordinary Resurrections" is about an afterschool program in the South Bronx. It's my favorite of all his books.

__________________

4145952823_2e0edce16f.jpg

Nobody puts THIS baby in the corner!


Platinum

Status: Offline
Posts: 460
Date:
Permalink  
 

Kbentleyis wrote:

The poster makes its point. His children are not pictured and it asks a legitimate question.

This is irony and BHO deserves every bit of it. Why are his children so off limits? Because HE said so? Everyone else's are fair game.



And this is the winner for best post in this thread.  Short, truthful and right to the point.

 



__________________
Don't blame me...I voted HILLARY!

http://www.barefootfoundation.com/index_en.php

http://www.savethechildren.org/


Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 2818
Date:
Permalink  
 

Jen the Michigander wrote:

Hillarysmygirl16 wrote:

 

Jen the Michigander wrote:

That "art" is sickening. It reminds me of a similar "art exhibit" I heard about back in 1997-ish, where some "artist" made a collage of photos of JonBenet Ramsey in her pageant dresses and titled it "Daddy's Little Whore."

As for the ad, it doesn't name the Obama children or include a photo of them or refer to them in a derogatory manner, so I don't have a problem with it. Besides, it addresses an important political issue-- the government is feeding American children unhealthy food and the children of the poor are (as always) the most vulnerable. Y'all don't want to get me started on educational equality issues, but let it suffice to say that I've read all of Jonathan Kozol's books and I even went to see him in person.



Isn't Jonathan Kozol the man who wrote "No Children Here"  He is the man that visits the innercity and writes about their school.  He came here once not so much to write about our public school because its poor because the kids here go to one of the wealthiest schools in the State but because of the failure rate and drop out rates of the kids in our community.
He also came out to our projects and checked out our afterschool program.
I read his books and think he is wonderful.

 




 



"There Are No Children Here" was written by Alex Kotlowitz. It's about two boys growing up in a Chicago housing project. IIRC, it was made into a movie where Oprah played their mother.

Jonathan Kozol's books include "Savage Inequalities", "Amazing Grace", "Ordinary Resurrections", and "Death At An Early Age." And yes, he travels around the country visiting schools. He tends to focus on the very rich vs. the very poor and not so much the schools in the middle like the ones my nieces have attended (the kind with 30 kids in a class instead of 15 like the rich schools or 45 like the poor ones). He might have checked out the afterschool program because "Ordinary Resurrections" is about an afterschool program in the South Bronx. It's my favorite of all his books.

I read those two books. I had the right man but the wrong book.  He came here about four years ago or maybe five.  He was good with the children and came back several times for about six months or so.  He interviewed my daughter and myself.

 



__________________

4459303562_3f593359a2_m.jpg

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard