'Un-American' attacks can't derail health care debate
Americans have been waiting for nearly a century for quality, affordable health care. By Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer
Health coverage for all was on the national agenda as early as 1912, thanks to Teddy Roosevelt's Bull Moose presidential run. Months after World War II came to an end in 1945, President Harry Truman called on Congress to guarantee all Americans the "right to adequate medical care and protection from the economic fears of sickness." From President Lyndon Johnson to President Bill Clinton, to President Obama's winning campaign on the promise of reform, there hasn't been a more debated domestic issue than the promise of affordable health care for all. We believe it is healthy for such a historic effort to be subject to so much scrutiny and debate. The failure of past attempts is a reminder that health insurance reform is a defining moment in our nation's history — it is well worth the time it takes to get it right. We are confident that we will get this right. Already, three House committees have passed this critical legislation and over August, the two of us will work closely with those three committees to produce one strong piece of legislation that the House will approve in September. In the meantime, as members of Congress spend time at home during August, they are talking with their constituents about reform. The dialogue between elected representatives and constituents is at the heart of our democracy and plays an integral role in assuring that the legislation we write reflects the genuine needs and concerns of the people we represent. However, it is now evident that an ugly campaign is underway not merely to misrepresent the health insurance reform legislation, but to disrupt public meetings and prevent members of Congress and constituents from conducting a civil dialogue. These tactics have included hanging in effigy one Democratic member of Congress in Maryland and protesters holding a sign displaying a tombstone with the name of another congressman in Texas, where protesters also shouted "Just say no!" drowning out those who wanted to hold a substantive discussion. Let the facts be heard These disruptions are occurring because opponents are afraid not just of differing views — but of the facts themselves. Drowning out opposing views is simply un-American. Drowning out the facts is how we failed at this task for decades. Health care is complex. It touches every American life. It drives our economy. People must be allowed to learn the facts. The first fact is that health insurance reform will mean more patient choice. It will allow every American who likes his or her current plan to keep it. And it will free doctors and patients to make the health decisions that make the most sense, not the most profits for insurance companies. Reform will mean stability and peace of mind for the middle class. Never again will medical bills drive Americans into bankruptcy; never again will Americans be in danger of losing coverage if they lose their jobs or if they become sick; never again will insurance companies be allowed to deny patients coverage because of pre-existing conditions. Lower costs, better care Reform will mean affordable coverage for all Americans. Our plan's cost-lowering measures include a public health insurance option to bring competitive pressure to bear on rapidly consolidating private insurers, research on health outcomes to better inform the decisions of patients and doctors, and electronic medical records to help doctors save money by working together. For seniors, the plan closes the notorious Medicare Part D "doughnut hole" that denies drug coverage to those with between $2,700 and $6,100 per year in prescriptions. Reform will also mean higher-quality care by promoting preventive care so health problems can be addressed before they become crises. This, too, will save money. We'll be a much healthier country if all patients can receive regular checkups and tests, such as mammograms and diabetes exams, without paying a dime out-of-pocket. This month, despite the disruptions, members of Congress will listen to their constituents back home and explain reform legislation. We are confident that our principles of affordable, quality health care will stand up to any and all critics. Now — with Americans strongly supporting health insurance reform, with Congress reaching consensus on a plan, and with a president who ran and won on this specific promise of change — America is closer than ever to this century-deferred goal. This fall, at long last, we must reach it.
Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is speaker of the House and Steny Hoyer, D-Md., is House majority leader.
“For everyone who's ever been counted out, but refused to be knocked out, and for everyone who works hard and never gives up, this one is for you.” - Hillary Rodham Clinton
“For everyone who's ever been counted out, but refused to be knocked out, and for everyone who works hard and never gives up, this one is for you.” - Hillary Rodham Clinton
The reason Bill Clinton was such a great president was that he had the ability (and intelligence) to explain complex ideas in a common sense way. Nancy Pelosi and the new Democrats have no finesse and they lack BC's smarts. They don't know how to present this health care overhaul and so the only way they can counter the valid points that are being brought up by the general population is by saying that these people are right-wing extremist racists who are ultimately "un-American." What the Democrats need to do is go back to the drawing board and come up with health care reform that actually does help Americans and that will save us money. The monstrosity they are trying to push seems to mostly help drug and insurance companies.
I have to say that in my opinion the public option is important. I've heard people say that it takes us one step closer to socialism, but I don't see it that way. First off all, I am concerned about how the government would fund government health care. That needs to be addressed in a serious way. But, having said that, just mandating that people get private health insurance only helps insurance companies. I don't see government-sponsored health care as socialistic. My reference point is the public state-funded university systems. State universities receive public funds (from us the tax payers) and thus they are much more affordable than private universities. The creation of state funded schools did not do away with private universities. Some people choose to send their kids to Harvard and others (who can't afford it) send their kids to the University of Wisconsin. Just like having state funded schools does not do away with private universities, so it stands to reason that a public health care option would not do away with private insurance companies. Some people would choose the no-frills public health care that they can afford or that is government-subsidized and those who can afford it would continue to choose the health care offered by a private insurer. That's how I see it. If BO doesn't support a public option I don't think regular people will benefit from this health care reform bill.