Hillarysworld

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info
TOPIC: Obama’s Embrace of a Bush Tactic Riles Congress (NYTimes 8/9/09)


Super Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
Obama’s Embrace of a Bush Tactic Riles Congress (NYTimes 8/9/09)
Permalink  
 


Apparently Obama's losing his luster with his own too.  This is an interesting article from the New York Times today.  Barney Frank and others are not happy with Obama messing with their Bills.


You can read the full article by  CHARLIE SAVAGE here:


"....................And last month several leading Democrats — including Representatives Barney Frank of Massachusetts and David R. Obey of Wisconsin — sent a letter to Mr. Obama complaining about one of his signing statements.

“During the previous administration, all of us were critical of the president’s assertion that he could pick and choose which aspects of Congressional statutes he was required to enforce,” they wrote. “We were therefore chagrined to see you appear to express a similar attitude.”....................."

 

".............................And in their July 21 letter, Mr. Frank and Mr. Obey — the chairmen of the Financial Services Committee and the Appropriations Committee — asked Mr. Obama to stop issuing such signing statements, warning that Congress might not approve more money for the banking organizations unless he agreed................................"

 

"...............................“We didn’t think it was an appropriate practice when President Bush was doing it, and our policy is such that we don’t think it is an appropriate practice when President Obama is doing it,” said H. Thomas Wells, who just stepped down as president of the American Bar Association.

In 2006, the association called the practice unconstitutional and said presidents should veto legislation if it had flaws, giving Congress a chance to override the pronouncements................................."

 

"..........................In the presidential campaign, the Republican nominee, Senator John McCain of Arizona,promised never to issue a signing statement. By contrast, Mr. Obama said it was a legitimate way “to protect a president’s constitutional prerogatives” when used with greater restraint than Mr. Bush.

“Restraint,” Mr. Obama and his campaign said then, included not issuing “signing statements that undermine the legislative intent” or “nullify or undermine Congressional instructions as enacted into law.”

But in March, when he issued a presidential memorandum on signing statements, Mr. Obama defined restraint as citing only “interpretations of the Constitution that are well founded,” a subtle shift that provides greater leeway..................."

 

".....................“He has not pushed the envelope as far as the Bush administration in making the kind of claims that Bush made,” said Phillip Cooper, a Portland State University professor whostudies signing statements. “But he is still using it in ways that were controversial before George W. Bush came to office.”.................."







__________________


Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 2818
Date:
Permalink  
 

Congress doesn't like that kind of stuff.  I can't wait until they turn on him but the Dummycrats won't do that.



__________________

4459303562_3f593359a2_m.jpg



Diamond

Status: Offline
Posts: 521
Date:
Permalink  
 

These dems are such pansies. Capable of eating their own, but wimps when it comes to standing up to Fraudicus.

__________________


Platinum

Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Date:
Permalink  
 

they are complaining about the boss.lol.little late.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard