Hillarysworld

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info
TOPIC: More reasons for incumbents to worry after Tuesday’s results (The Hill) 06-02-2010)


Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1695
Date:
More reasons for incumbents to worry after Tuesday’s results (The Hill) 06-02-2010)
Permalink  
 



It’s no surprise that the incumbents are struggling to hold onto their seats.  For some, it’s a lost cause.

This article points out that an erosion of the public’s trust in government is a primary reason for the problems Dem incumbents face.  Obviously, this is a big factor.  The Tea Party movement is being credited by some as a factor in the Dem losses, as well, and, deservedly so.

However, there is another group, overlooked by MSM, that is also working against Dem incumbents.  PUMA, is also a factor in the expected Dem losses. 

We pumas have said from the beginning that we would work to hold the corrupt Dems accountable come election time.  Our impact on these elections should not be underestimated.  We may not be a highly structured group, but we are motivated - by  the corruption and sexism of 2008 - and, we have long memories.  We said the Dems would pay for tossing women, including Hillary Clinton under the bus, and we are making good on that promise.

The DNC needs to be aware that the Pubs and the Tea Partiers are not the only ones
working to send Dems incumbents home. 

BTW - I’m glad to see Blanche Lincoln is still in the running.  She was a loyal Hillary support, who has been targeted by both the Obamacrats and the Tea Party.  I, for one, would like to help her defeat the Dem challenger.

More reasons for incumbents to worry after Tuesday’s results
By Sean J. Miller - 06/02/10 07:25 PM ET

Tuesday’s primaries gave establishment candidates another reason to worry in a year filled with anti-incumbent sentiment.

Two more lawmakers lost and several party favorites didn’t make it make it to the general election.

And with several establishment candidates on ballot next week, they are balancing party loyalty with an attempt to appeal to independent voters.
One of the biggest lessons that may have come out of Tuesday’s results was voter trust.
Rep. Parker Griffith (R-Ala.), who crossed the aisle and became a Republican in December, said he lost his primary Tuesday because GOP voters never trusted him.

“I was not accepted by the Republican Party, they just didn’t believe me,” Griffith said at a press conference in Huntsville Wednesday. “I was rejected by the constituents, they did not accept me and I appreciate that, because that’s how America is supposed to work.”

And Glen Bolger, a Republican pollster, said party loyalty also plays a role.

“If there’s examples where you have been disloyal to the party that’s going to be problematic,” he said.

Bolger cited Rep. Artur Davis (D-Ala.), who lost Alabama’s Democratic gubernatorial nomination Tuesday, as the latest example of an incumbent going down in a primary for bucking his party’s legislative priorities.

Davis voted against the Democrats’ healthcare reform bill and attacked his primary opponent, state Agriculture Commissioner Ron Sparks, for supporting it.

“He basically tried to run away from [President Barack] Obama,” Bolger said. “That might have worked in a general election but he never got the chance because Democratic primary voters said, ‘no, you’re not going to turn your back on your party and still expect our support.’”

Eleven states hold elections next Tuesday and several party favorites could find their campaigns coming to an end.

Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.), who faces a June 8 runoff against Lt. Gov. Bill Halter (D), may join Sens. Bob Bennett (R-Utah) and Arlen Specter (D-Pa.) as the next incumbent shown the door by frustrated primary voters.

Lincoln is under siege by unions and progressive advocacy groups who were angered by her opposition to the Employee Free Choice Act and her role in the healthcare debate.

She has pushed back with support from former President Bill Clinton, who told supporters she’s in sync with their priorities. But it’s clear Arkansans are wary and primary electorates have shown already they will reject a candidate they don’t trust.

In California, the hard-fought Republican Senate primary between former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina, former Rep. Tom Campbell, and state Assemblyman Chuck DeVore, has boiled down to a battle of who’s the real conservative in the race.

Fiorina, who led in recent poll, has argued that Campbell is in tune with Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.). Fiorina ran a TV ad quoting conservative favorite Sarah Palin as saying Campbell “seems to bear almost no difference to Boxer.”

In Nevada, Republican Senate candidate Sue Lowden has sought the support of a bedrock of conservative groups such as the Susan B. Anthony List and the Nevada branch of National Right to Life PAC. As Lowden claimed the mantle of the traditional Republican, she faces a stiff challenge from Sharron Angle, who has the support of the Tea Party Express and other groups.

Establishment candidates don’t have a good record in this cycle’s primaries. The National Republican Congressional Committee has lost five of its supported candidates, including Griffith, and it may lose another next Tuesday.

The committee is backing auto dealer Scott Rigell (R) in the primary to take on freshman Rep. Glenn Nye (D-Va.), but Tea Party groups have endorsed Rigell’s rival, businessman Ben Loyola (R).

Rigell had difficulty burnishing his GOP credentials after it emerged he donated $2,000 to Obama's presidential campaign in 2008 and his car dealerships received hundreds of thousands in taxpayer funds through the "cash for clunkers" program. He has attacked the president and the clunkers program in the primary campaign.

Nye’s seat is a top GOP target.

And as primary candidates make themselves more appealing to their party’s electorate, capturing independent voters in the general election will prove challenging.

Bolger argues Republicans will have an easier time than Democrats repositioning after the coming primaries.

“I believe it will be easier for Republicans to make that transition than Democrats because the Republican base does unify very, very quickly after a primary,” he said. “Their eyes are on the prize of making it harder for Obama and [Speaker Nancy] Pelosi and [Senate Majority Leader Harry] Reid to pass their agenda.”

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/other-races/101133-more-reasons-for-incumbents-to-worry-after-tuesdays-results


-- Edited by freespirit on Wednesday 2nd of June 2010 10:32:11 PM

__________________
It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.... Men, their rights and nothing more; women, their rights and nothing less.  ~Susan B. Anthony

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard