Hillarysworld

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info
TOPIC: (2/22/10) CBO: Obama health 'plan' too vague to analyze (Washington Post)


Platinum

Status: Offline
Posts: 460
Date:
(2/22/10) CBO: Obama health 'plan' too vague to analyze (Washington Post)
Permalink  
 


"President Obama said he would put out a full bill ahead of Thursday's highly touted bipartisan health summit, but what he released on Monday is so bare-bones that the Congressional Budget Office said there's not even enough detail to start working on a cost estimate.

The administration did not post any bill text on the White House Web site, instead offering a detailed outline of what the legislation would do.

The nonpartisan CBO, which provides the official cost numbers on legislative proposals, said it has received several requests to review Mr. Obama's blueprint — released three days ahead of the bipartisan summit — but could not do so until the White House provides more details to its broad outlines.

"Although the proposal reflects many elements that were included in the health care bills passed by the House and the Senate last year, it modifies many of those elements and also includes new ones. Moreover, preparing a cost estimate requires very detailed specifications of numerous provisions, and the materials that were released this morning do not provide sufficient detail on all of the provisions," the CBO said in a blog post Monday.

"Therefore, CBO cannot provide a cost estimate for the proposal without additional detail, and, even if such detail were provided, analyzing the proposal would be a time-consuming process that could not be completed this week."

Asked whether the White House was planning to send the bill to the budget office for a score or come up with its own cost estimate, press secretary Robert Gibbs said, "I think it would be premature to go through that process prior to Thursday."

Mr. Gibbs added that he believes the administration will have estimates on different sections of the bill ready for discussion at the summit.

Previously, the CBO pegged the cost of the House health bill at $894 billion over 10 years. That's compared to $871 billion for the Senate version, which the White House said it used as a template in developing its own proposal. "

And this is EVERYTHING you need to know about Obama's bill....more smoke and mirrors while taking away the very last cent in our wallets.  Chicago politics at its finest.

Shame on this man...shame on him for his utter disrespect to those he is supposed to serve.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/22/scorekeeper-obama-plan-too-barren-price-tag/



__________________
Don't blame me...I voted HILLARY!

http://www.barefootfoundation.com/index_en.php

http://www.savethechildren.org/


Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1695
Date:
Permalink  
 

Not enough details, huh? Too little information, you say. Well, since when did Obama have to prove anything to anyone? If he says the proposed legislation is cost effective, then people are supposed to accept that. The CBO needs to take a page from the MSM Guide to Reporting on Obama, and NEVER QUESTION the great one. lol

__________________
It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.... Men, their rights and nothing more; women, their rights and nothing less.  ~Susan B. Anthony



Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 2818
Date:
Permalink  
 

LOL Freespirit.  This article doesn't surprse me he has no one to steal plans from anymore and Hillary's job is FP sucks to be Obama and having to actually come up with plans lol

__________________

4459303562_3f593359a2_m.jpg

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard