By Boston Herald Editorial Staff Friday, January 29, 2010 - Added 13h ago
Like President Barack Obama we shudder at the practical impact of last week’s Supreme Court decision that lifts the ban on direct political expenditures by corporations and unions. Obama is worried the decision “will open the floodgates for special interests.” At the very least it will flood our TV screens with more political blather.
Still we’re confused by Obama’s call during his State of the Union address for Congress to “pass a bill that helps to correct some of these problems.” Earlier he had ordered his aides to start working on a “forceful response” to the ruling.
Short of repealing the First Amendment, just what would he do?
Washington Post Staff Writer Friday, January 29, 2010
President Obama called out the Supreme Court. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. winced at the accusation and muttered, "Not true." And then official Washington and the legal community went to the tape, and examined it frame by frame.
What they saw -- either a president gratuitously criticizing the silent black-robed justices sitting in front of him or a conservative jurist injudiciously reacting to a man who had voted against his confirmation -- depended on from where they started.
And legal experts said they had never seen anything quite like it, a rare and unvarnished showdown between two political branches during what is usually the careful choreography of the State of the Union address.
"I can't ever recall a president taking a swipe at the Supreme Court like that," said Lucas A. Powe Jr., a Supreme Court expert at the University of Texas law school. The closest precedent most could find was President Franklin D. Roosevelt's criticism of the court in his 1937 address to Congress.