Hillarysworld

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info
TOPIC: "Democrats Wary as Two Senators Decide to Retire" (NY Times 1/6/10)


Diamond

Status: Offline
Posts: 4567
Date:
"Democrats Wary as Two Senators Decide to Retire" (NY Times 1/6/10)
Permalink  
 


nytlogo152x23.gif

"

Democrats Wary as Two Senators Decide to Retire


Published: January 6, 2010

WASHINGTON — The sudden decision by two senior Democratic senators to retire shook the party’s leaders on Wednesday and signaled that President Obama is facing a perilous political environment that could hold major implications for this year’s midterm elections and his own agenda.


The rapidly shifting climate, less than a year after Mr. Obama took office on the strength of a historic Democratic sweep, was brought into focus by the announcements that Senators Christopher J. Dodd of Connecticut and Byron L. Dorgan of North Dakota would retire rather than wage uphill fights for re-election.

With the chances growing that the election in November would end the 60-vote majority Democrats enjoy in the Senate — the practical threshold for being able to overcome united Republican opposition — the president and his party face additional urgency to make progress on his agenda this year.

There was no immediate sign that the developments would further complicate White House efforts to secure final passage of Mr. Obama’s main domestic priority, the overhaul of the health care system, but the political pressure on Democrats from competitive states and districts will not make it any easier.

Following on the heels of the news of the senators’ retirements, Gov. Bill Ritter Jr. of Colorado, a Democrat, also announced Wednesday that he would not seek a second term.

Together, the developments heightened a perception that a conservative push against the president’s ambitious agenda, a sluggish recovery from the deep recession and an outbreak of angry populism have combined to deplete Mr. Obama’s political strength and give Republicans a chance for big gains in this year’s races for the Senate and the House.

To the degree that the retirements reflect increasing skepticism among voters about the direction Democrats are pushing the country, Mr. Obama could face a tougher time winning legislative support as he presses ahead with initiatives on climate change, financial regulation, education and other issues.


Republicans seized on the resignations as a way to raise money and generate enthusiasm among voters in their conservative base.

“Voters and donors out in the country see two senior Democrats, both of whom were perceived to be safe a year ago, now retiring for fear of losing,” said Rob Jesmer, executive director of the National Republican Senatorial Committee. “This further underscores our belief that with each passing day, the environment is getting better and better for Republicans, which energizes our people and demoralizes theirs.”

The White House and Democratic Party leaders reached out on Wednesday to reassure other potentially vulnerable Democrats in an effort to prevent any more retirements or party-switching. Obama aides played down the developments, saying it would be foolish to make predictions now about the November elections before Mr. Obama had even delivered his State of the Union address. If health care legislation passes and the economy improves, advisers believe the president and the party will be in a stronger position by fall.

More . . .
"

__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010
Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010

Madam Secretary Blog at ForeignPolicy.com
Project Vote Smart - Stay informed and engaged!


Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1695
Date:
Permalink  
 

I had thought it would take at least a few years before the Dems began to be edged out. For them to be feeling the pressure just one year after Obama's installation and coronation is pretty remarkable.

I hope the Republicans will act on the advice of the more forward thinking in their party, and become more inclusive, more concerned about the rights of minorities and women, more liberal in their views regarding social policies. If they continue to define themselves in the narrow terms that their right wing has demanded, the party will continue to suffer losses - of both members and of elections. Independents are key - Repubs need to reach out to them. And, the really conservative among their ranks who continue to bash the Clintons at every opportunity, need to be smart enough to shut the hell up. There's no way I would vote for a candidate who attempted to gain any mileage by lobbing unwarranted slams at the Clintons. Adjusting to change is tough as we Pumas understand as well or better than anyone - but it's doable.

__________________
It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.... Men, their rights and nothing more; women, their rights and nothing less.  ~Susan B. Anthony

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard