Hillarysworld

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info
TOPIC: "One Premium, Two Checks: How Abortion Will Be Paid For Under The Nelson Compromise" (TPM blog 12/19/09)


Diamond

Status: Offline
Posts: 4567
Date:
"One Premium, Two Checks: How Abortion Will Be Paid For Under The Nelson Compromise" (TPM blog 12/19/09)
Permalink  
 


logo-258x120.gif


stupak-nelson-split-cropped-proto-custom_2.jpg
Rep. Bart Stupak (D-MI) and Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE)

One Premium, Two Checks: How Abortion Will Be Paid For Under The Nelson Compromise

In the House health care bill, consumers who receive federal premium subsidies would be forbidden from buying any insurance policy that covers abortion. That provision--the so-called Stupak amendment--threatened to blow up health care reform. Originally, it's the language Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE) wanted to see in the Senate health care bill. In the end, he didn't get that.

But what he did get might still draw the ire of pro-choice activists and legislators. According to a senior Senate leadership aide, under the Nelson compromise, "ndividuals receiving subsidies will have one premium that they pay with two distinct transactions."

Put another way: If you're buying insurance with help from the government, and the policy you want to buy covers abortions, you have to write two checks (or authorize two credit card transactions, etc.) for your plan. If the plan costs $1000 a month, and the insurer plans to sequester $50 to put into a pool that covers abortions, you have to make one payment of $950 and a separate payment of $50.

So far, leading pro-choice Democrats in the Senate say they can abide by that. Here's Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) Patty Murray (D-WA):

We said all along that we wanted to ensure there was a firewall between private and public funds -- this compromise achieves that.

We said we would not accept language that prohibited a woman from using her own private funds for her legal reproductive health care -- this compromise meets that test.

And we said we would stop Stupak -- which we did. Let's be clear -- we were both much happier with the Capps language and the language in the underlying bill.

But compromise was necessary to get a health care bill for the American people, and this compromise achieves that.

We know that Republicans are already gearing up their opposition to the compromise on pro-life grounds. And Rep. Bart Stupak (D-MI) may be gearing up to oppose it. But what will other pro-life and pro-choice Dems in the House say? We'll let you know as reactions crystallize.

====================================

Please discuss. Thanks.


-- Edited by Sanders on Sunday 20th of December 2009 09:20:24 PM

__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010
Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010

Madam Secretary Blog at ForeignPolicy.com
Project Vote Smart - Stay informed and engaged!


Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 2818
Date:
Permalink  
 

I guess women get thrown under the bus in both versions.  I am angry at Boxer and the other women that did not fight this outrage.

__________________

4459303562_3f593359a2_m.jpg

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard