Hillarysworld

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info
TOPIC: Democrats Consider New Presidential Nominating Process (CNN 12/05/09)


SuperModerator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1788
Date:
Democrats Consider New Presidential Nominating Process (CNN 12/05/09)
Permalink  
 


Let me just start this off by saying I don't trust these people and my b.s. detector is going off big time.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/12/05/democrats-consider-new-presidential-nominating-process/

Commission members, who range from lawmakers and grassroots activists to President Obama’s campaign manager, are charged with putting forth recommendations to help expand the Democratic base and increase more ethnic and regional diversity in choosing the party’s presidential nominee in 2016 and beyond, assuming Obama seeks a second term.

A commission suggestion would be to allow the first four states that held nominating contests in the January 2008 maintain their early, privileged calendar positions. But these states – Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina – would be directed to delay holding their caucuses and primaries before February 1. All other states would be forbidden from holding their nominating contests until at least the first Tuesday in March.


Wait, there's more manure in the pile...

The commission also discussed how to reduce the influence of unpledged delegates – lawmakers and party insiders also know as superdelegates – who played a big role in the 2008 nomination contest.

Reduce them??? How about doing away with them altogether and letting the voters decide???

And here's where our Michigan Dem Party hack weighs in:

Mark Brewer, chairman of the Michigan Democratic Party, said he had no problem with reducing the number of superdelegates as long as state party chairs and vice chairs maintained their status and party leaders continued to play a role at the conventions.

But Brewer took exception to the idea of allowing four states to be granted a special exemption to hold their primaries before other states.

"From the perspective of Michigan and other states, it is unfair that any state have a permanent place at the top of the process," said Brewer, who attended the meeting but is not a commission member. "It is unfair to give any states or state a monopoly."


__________________

4145952823_2e0edce16f.jpg

Nobody puts THIS baby in the corner!


Diamond

Status: Offline
Posts: 1191
Date:
Permalink  
 

I've lost so much hope and trust in the voting system.

__________________

Barack/Barry:  If you're NOT LEGIT, then you MUST QUIT!!



Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 798
Date:
Permalink  
 

Mercy Me, here they go pumping it up and out.

-- Edited by Building 4112 on Monday 7th of December 2009 01:20:47 PM

__________________


Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1695
Date:
Permalink  
 

This article from Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy sheds a little more light on this. The Dems are talking abut "de-emphasizing the influence lawmakers and political insiders have on choosing the party nominee." There doesn't seem to be a great deal of enthusiasm, however. I'm not counting on the party to do the right thing.

Are Democrats Finally Getting A Clue?
"Yes, and no. They realize they need to change how the primaries are conducted, yet don't see any real problems with how the last one went. I have written about the rampant Caucus fraud ad nauseum, but apparently, the DNC missed it. Even though the Clinton Campaign told them about it. Oh, whatever - you can't make the blind see, especially when they don't want to see.

Of course, my favorite (cough, choke) representative, Jim Clyburn, who is MY representative (cough, choke) is the voice for this article, "Democrats Consider New Presidential Nominating Process." Honestly, the whole thing would be laughable if it weren't so delusional:
National Democrats are considering changing the presidential nominating process, by establishing a new primary calendar and deemphasizing the influence lawmakers and political insiders have on choosing the party nominee.

The battle for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination was marred by controversy as the Democratic National Committee argued with some state parties over when they could hold their primaries and caucuses and candidates were forced to take sides in this important internal party dispute.

House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-South Carolina, said that the 2008 nomination contest "yielded a great candidate," but readily acknowledged the problems that arose.

"We need to improve a little bit in spite of the fact that we got a great candidate out of the process," Clyburn said Saturday at a meeting of a DNC working group tasked with drafting a new plan. "It was not very comfortable at various points along the way.""

__________________
It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.... Men, their rights and nothing more; women, their rights and nothing less.  ~Susan B. Anthony



Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 2818
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't trust these idiots period.  Obama is a lying cheating bastard and I can't wait until his ass is thrown out of the white house,

__________________

4459303562_3f593359a2_m.jpg



Diamond

Status: Offline
Posts: 1191
Date:
Permalink  
 

They just want to know how they can cheat next time, since they got caught red-handed this time.

freespirit wrote:


This article from Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy sheds a little more light on this. The Dems are talking abut "de-emphasizing the influence lawmakers and political insiders have on choosing the party nominee." There doesn't seem to be a great deal of enthusiasm, however. I'm not counting on the party to do the right thing.

Are Democrats Finally Getting A Clue?
"Yes, and no. They realize they need to change how the primaries are conducted, yet don't see any real problems with how the last one went. I have written about the rampant Caucus fraud ad nauseum, but apparently, the DNC missed it. Even though the Clinton Campaign told them about it. Oh, whatever - you can't make the blind see, especially when they don't want to see.

Of course, my favorite (cough, choke) representative, Jim Clyburn, who is MY representative (cough, choke) is the voice for this article, "Democrats Consider New Presidential Nominating Process." Honestly, the whole thing would be laughable if it weren't so delusional:
National Democrats are considering changing the presidential nominating process, by establishing a new primary calendar and deemphasizing the influence lawmakers and political insiders have on choosing the party nominee.

The battle for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination was marred by controversy as the Democratic National Committee argued with some state parties over when they could hold their primaries and caucuses and candidates were forced to take sides in this important internal party dispute.

House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-South Carolina, said that the 2008 nomination contest "yielded a great candidate," but readily acknowledged the problems that arose.

"We need to improve a little bit in spite of the fact that we got a great candidate out of the process," Clyburn said Saturday at a meeting of a DNC working group tasked with drafting a new plan. "It was not very comfortable at various points along the way.""




 



__________________

Barack/Barry:  If you're NOT LEGIT, then you MUST QUIT!!



Platinum

Status: Offline
Posts: 198
Date:
Permalink  
 

I'm no longer a democrat. I saw them STEAL votes from one candidate and give them to another in broad daylight

I really don't give a $hit anymore what they do, I have no intentions of voting democrat for a LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG time.

__________________


gold

Status: Offline
Posts: 33
Date:
Permalink  
 

What a crock of Dims. Dump every single caucus, have primaries--one person/one vote--only, count every vote ONCE on paper ballots, and let winner take all in each state. My North Texas Democratic county convention was a disaster. After painstaking credentials checking, the first false bho the fraud 2-1 win over Hillary was reversed to the true 2-1 Hillary win over Obama. Over a thousand out-of-county residents came in to cheat for the fraud.

Clyburn and other crooks like him are pandering to any remaining Democratic voters.

__________________
Texas Playwright


Diamond

Status: Offline
Posts: 4567
Date:
Permalink  
 

It is broken and we know it. The evidence of how badly it is broken is in http://www.diversityj.com/ElectionResults2008Primary.html

PopularVotesJune21st.jpg



Why does it need to take until 2016 to fix such a broken the process that yields such wrong outcomes?

__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010
Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010

Madam Secretary Blog at ForeignPolicy.com
Project Vote Smart - Stay informed and engaged!
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard