Hillarysworld

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info
TOPIC: (09-18-2009) "An inconvenient truth about global warming" (www.bbc.co.uk)


Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 340
Date:
(09-18-2009) "An inconvenient truth about global warming" (www.bbc.co.uk)
Permalink  
 


The global warming narrative - that mankind's addiction to burning fossil fuels is rapidly changing the climate - may be about to go seriously off message.

"Far from suggesting the planet will get warmer, one of the world's leading climate modellers says the latest data indicates we could be in for a significant period of steady temperatures and possibly even a little global cooling.

Professor Mojib Latif, from the Leibniz Institute of Marine Sciences at Kiel University in Germany, has been looking at the influence of cyclical changes to ocean currents and temperatures in the Atlantic, a feature known as the North Atlantic Oscillation. When he factored these natural fluctuations into his global climate model, professor Latif found the results would bring the remorseless rise in average global temperatures to an abrupt halt.

"The strong warming effect that we experienced during the last decades will be interrupted. Temperatures will be more or less steady for some years, and thereafter will pickup again and continue to warm"."

 

"With apologies to Al Gore, professor Latif's finding is something of an "inconvenient truth" for the global warming debate.

And the timing couldn't be much worse. World leaders are due to meet in Copenhagen in December to hammer out an agreement on cutting greenhouse gas emissions to replace the Kyoto Treaty. It certainly won't help if there are a couple of inches of snow on the ground outside the convention centre, and climate models are predicting a sustained period of steady, or even falling, global temperatures.

Professor Philip Stott believes climate sceptics may seize on the research as evidence that the whole global warming hypothesis is fundamentally flawed: If natural cycles can interrupt, or even reverse climate change, maybe we don't need to take it so seriously."

Source:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/today/tomfeilden/2009/09/an_inconvenient_truth_about_gl.html

 



__________________




Super Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 260
Date:
Permalink  
 

The truth is that no one can model this accurately.  It seems that the more arrogant a scientist you are, the more people think you know what the heck you are talking about.  There is so much data out there that contradicts Al Gore it would make your head spin.  Steven Chu is not an environmental scientist.  He got his Nobel Prize in something completely unrelated.  Nobel Prize winning scientists are so narrow band, they live an breath only their particular science.  I wouldn't believe him any more than I would believe any other physicist.  There is too much conflicting data for either argument.

I have never believed that man contributes to global warming.  Man does contribute to polluting our water supply and that, to me, is infinitesimally more important.

The country the controls the drinkable water, controls the world.  The Great Lakes (except those in Oregon) are 25% of the world's fresh water supply.  That is HUGE for the US and Canada.  You can live without air conditioning or gas/oil heat, but you cannot live without water.

__________________


Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 2818
Date:
Permalink  
 

Not to mention it makes no sense to me what are people supposed to do for heat since most homes are equipped with gas lines.  Frankly I hope we leave this liberal stuff behind when it comes to the environment.  Men are that that special that they can destroy the planet.

__________________

4459303562_3f593359a2_m.jpg

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard