I didn't find the Hillary Clinton segment funny at all. I am reporting this post on youtube and perhaps these gentlemen won't think calling Hillary a b**ch is so funny. I was extremely offended.
I didn't find the Hillary Clinton segment funny at all. I am reporting this post on youtube and perhaps these gentlemen won't think calling Hillary a b**ch is so funny. I was extremely offended.
This You Tube is making fun of the original one in which the Washington Post used that term against Hillary. They are making the Washington Post look like idiots, that is the intent of this video to take them to task for not reporting properly and to make them seem stupid for thinking that is journalism. It is a satire meant to demean the Washington Post for having called her what they did. This is not the Washington Posts serious calling of that name, it's the total opposite. I have reported the Washington Posts segment. This one is making them look like fools on purpose.
These gentlemen are not calling Hillary that word, they are making fun of the people who did!
I didn't find the Hillary Clinton segment funny at all. I am reporting this post on youtube and perhaps these gentlemen won't think calling Hillary a b**ch is so funny. I was extremely offended.
I think their intent was to say that that is what the Washington Post does - just calls Hillary names for no reason, or makes fun of her actions, and pretends like that's news. They were trying to illustrate very graphically how stupid WaPo is for doing that sort of thing.
__________________
Barack/Barry: If you're NOT LEGIT, then you MUST QUIT!!
The point they are trying to make is that Washpo is not journalism. Dana Milibank is a poser and a loser. He thinks that using Fraternity-style antics on a YouTube video is going to win him the Pulitzer. Dana Milibank needs to get a frickin life.
