Hillarysworld

http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-politics/white-house-insider-president-obama-is-lost-absolutely-lost/

Another interview with the supposed White House Insider... This is the second of two parts. If you haven't read one of these before, I emphasize that I have no idea who this person is or if he's for real. But my gut tells me that at least some of this stuff is true, and so I'll keep posting it. The Insider's words are in boldface, to make it an easier read.
In your email to me last week, you indicated a scandal was coming to the White House.  Could you elaborate a bit more on that now? Sadly, with this White House it is no longer a matter of a scandal, but of scandals.  I see you did a story recently on the Justice Department situation surrounding the voting rights case.  Continue watching that – it’s going to break open more soon after Republicans take the House.  As you stated, it’s going to be investigated.

At least give us an idea on this scandal you indicated earlier.  However you wish to say it, I promised my readers information. (Laughs) Your readers!  You are really getting into this thing now aren’t you!? Your readers…uh-huh.  Don’t forget who gave you this information.  Don’t forget who can take it away, ok?  And I will.  You’re playing your part in this – and I am writing the script.  Don’t you -expletive- forget that.

Just tell me about this scandal. (Leans back, folds arms across chest.  Looks outside – then back to me) Ok then – I’ll point your nose in the right direction.  Enough people are sniffing in the same garbage pile anyways, including the Times.  Though I suspect they are burying it at the moment, or trying to.  They are still heavily invested in Obama, but that may change soon… Go back to Chicago.  That is the key.  There is other crap around the White House, other things that could trip them up, but Chicago is where the real heavy deal is that could bring the administration down.  Go back and review Blagojevich.  Go back and review Rezko, Barton, Stern,  Giordano, Carothers, Jarret.  It’s one and the same. It’s all connected, and it’s big.  And people know.  The White House is -expletive- itself over this stuff.  Pelosi has it. Clintons have it – more of it than they had in 2008.

(Interrupts) What do you mean “have it”?  The information – the story.  At least some of it, enough of it.  It’s all a chess match you know.  A series of moves. Right now the White House is scrambling, and they don’t know enemies from friends anymore.  The party is attempting to localize the damage so it doesn’t spread.  Make it just about Chicago, and worst case, Obama – but not the party.  And so you look back to Chicago, you look at the Justice Department, connect the dots.  One investigation will potentially reveal the other.  And it’s all setting up to happen now if the November elections go down with a Republican landslide.  Obama will be left without protection.  His inner circle is scared to death.  I mean truly frightened by the prospects of what could be coming at them in the coming months.  They have enemies both in the Republican Party and the Democratic Party.  President Obama is lost.  Absolutely lost.”

And what if this never happens?  What if there is no scandal? What if Obama is simply re-elected in 2012 and serves a full and successful second term? I suppose that is a possibility – but not a probable one.  They are scrambling to make that happen, but after November, the White House loses its protection.  I told you that – you understand that, right?

You are talking about Congress?  Yes-yes…without Congress, without the Congressional leadership to squash potential hearings, the White House is far more vulnerable.  Remember Lewinski?  If the Democrats had not lost Congress in 1994, there would have been no scandal – at least not to the extent that it became.  But Democrats didn’t control Congress, and so the scandal was allowed – encouraged by those -expletive- Republicans to move ahead.  Same thing with Watergate.  Democrats in Congress allowed the scandal to grow and move ahead.  That’s how it works.  And now we have a Democrat President, realizing he is looking at a Republican Congress, and he is facing a real -expletive- storm.

You used Watergate as an example.  Do you really think Obama could be facing a Watergate type scandal?  I mean, something that big? Yes I do.  I hope not.  That is what is going on right now – I’m trying to explain that part of it to you but maybe I’m not doing a good enough job of it.  There are those in the party – the Democratic Party, who are right now actively preparing for that possible outcome and taking protective measures to protect the party.  Let Obama go down for it – but save the party.  President Obama in turn – at least those around him who are capable enough still to function in that way, are trying to keep the party entangled in the mess, to motivate them to continue protecting the White House.  THAT is what is going on right now.  And the stakes are very high – the repercussions very serious.  That is why I keep telling you to fully appreciate the dangers here.  This stuff is no joke.  That is why I came to you.  If this goes bad, and it could just like that, I can pull the plug.  And make no mistake – I will.

I get that – but I’m still having a hard time believing a scandal so big is not being reported by the media. You’re wrong there.  It is being reported – bits and pieces of it.  The story will already be out there and growing before the mainstream finally runs with it.  Don’t forget, most of them still want to protect the White House.  That is simply fact.  I know this – I worked directly with them during the campaign.  But it’s starting to change – and eventually it will break.  The barbarians haven’t broken down the gate yet – but after these midterms, they will.  Look at the Democrats who are now openly challenging the president.  Every day another one rebukes the president.  That is an incredibly dangerous thing to do politically – it can destroy a career.  Ask yourself why they would be so willing to do that.  Are they just stupid, too bold – or is it something else?