Hillarysworld

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info
TOPIC: "Fool Me Twice?" (NYTimes Op-Ed 10/23/10) - reg. Taxes on repatriated profits


Diamond

Status: Offline
Posts: 4567
Date:
"Fool Me Twice?" (NYTimes Op-Ed 10/23/10) - reg. Taxes on repatriated profits
Permalink  
 


Read @ NYTimes.com
(Emphasis added)

Fool Me Twice?

In 2004, America’s multinational corporations offered Congress a deal: They would repatriate hundreds of billions of dollars in foreign profits — to invest in new plants and create new jobs at home — in exchange for a break from the 35 percent corporate tax rate imposed on overseas profits when they are brought into the country.

A Republican-controlled Congress leapt at it, passing the Homeland Investment Act, which allowed companies to repatriate some $300 billion in 2005 and pay only 5.25 percent in taxes. As for all of those promised factories and jobs, they did not materialize. Research by three prominent economists, including Kristin Forbes, a former top economic adviser to President George W. Bush, found that between 60 and 92 cents of every dollar brought home found its way into shareholders’ pockets.

The law required that companies use the repatriated money for productive purposes like research and hiring. That did not matter. Money being fungible, firms could easily claim they were not using “those” dollars on stock buybacks and executive pay.

American multinationals are at it again. In an op-ed article in The Wall Street Journal, the chief executive of Cisco, John Chambers, and the president of Oracle, Safra Catz, estimated that American companies have about $1 trillion in profits stashed abroad that they could repatriate for the greater good of the American economy if taxes on that money were lowered to about 5 percent.

Congress should not be fooled again. Tax amnesties are extremely expensive. And what big corporation will ever repatriate profits at the standard rate when every few years it can expect to get another “special” break?

Large multinationals are not refraining from investing in the United States because their money is locked up abroad. Many have large piles of cash in the United States, too. Interest rates are near historic lows, and banks will trip over themselves to lend to big multinationals sitting on mountains of cash. If they are not investing, it is because of the uncertain economic outlook.

Continues @ NYTimes.com
===================

This tax holiday also is part of the Bush tax holiday that is about to expire... that the Republicans want extended.

I don't think companies will create jobs in the U.S. if after 6 years of this tax holiday we extend it for another two years.  All we will end up doing is reduce income flow into the U.S. Budget when the companies continue to create jobs outside the U.S. even as the repatriate profits without paying taxes.  Yes, shareholders will become richer in the U.S.; hence jobless recovery.



-- Edited by Sanders on Sunday 24th of October 2010 04:12:03 AM

__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010
Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010

Madam Secretary Blog at ForeignPolicy.com
Project Vote Smart - Stay informed and engaged!
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard