Hillarysworld

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info
TOPIC: Sarah Palin: Embracing Feminism, or Co-Opting it for Conservatives? (Politics Daily 6/10/10)


SuperModerator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1788
Date:
Sarah Palin: Embracing Feminism, or Co-Opting it for Conservatives? (Politics Daily 6/10/10)
Permalink  
 


http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/06/10/sarah-palin-embracing-feminism-or-co-opting-it-for-conservativ/

"Mama Grizzly" Sarah Palin is once again proving to be a thorn in the side of the feminist blogosphere, which has recently been invigorated by the debate over her co-option of the word "feminism."

Since her ascension to the coveted status of one of the most visible women in American politics, feminists have engaged in a spirited discussion about Palin's impact on the progress of women's liberation. But her speech last month at a fund-raising breakfast for the Susan B. Anthony List -- a coalition whose goal is to elect female anti-abortion candidates -- has especially drawn the ire of many feminists because, among other things, she so eagerly and freely drew upon the words "feminism" and "feminist" ("no less than a dozen times" notes Feministing's Jessica Valenti).

At the event, Palin celebrated anti-abortion candidates and supporters and said that they embodied an "emerging, conservative, feminist identity."

Palin crowed about how the Right, and specifically the Susan B. Anthony List, is reclaiming the feminist movement and bringing it "back to its original roots." But, typical of Palin, this is empty talk: Lynn Sherr, a biographer of Anthony, and Ann Gordon, a historian who edited Anthony's papers, said as much in the Washington Post: "We have read every single word that this very voluble -- and endlessly political -- woman left behind. Our conclusion: Anthony spent no time on the politics of abortion. It was of no interest to her, despite living in a society (and a family) where women aborted unwanted pregnancies."

But this truth is probably too inconvenient for Palin and those who fill out her anti-abortion cohort.

What's more, the co-option of feminism by anti-feminists is nothing new. Amanda Marcotte of Slate points out that Palin is simply "the latest incarnation of a long and noble line of feminist anti-feminists: women who call themselves feminist but also object to the existence of the feminist movement and organize in opposition to it."


The 111th Congress is comprised of a record number of women -- 95 -- but only 21 are Republican. In both the House and Senate, only 10 percent of Republican lawmakers are women, while roughly 25 percent of Democrats in the House and Senate are women. Neither party's record of electing women is anything to write home about, but clearly the Democrats are more willing to include and elect women, which is perhaps why conservative women have given up on the shrinking tent that is mainstream conservatism and embraced the Tea Party.

It's not just that the Republican Party has historically neglected to support and elect women that has drawn conservative women to the Tea Party movement. Indeed, several important events have converged over the past few years to bring about an atmosphere in which conservative female candidates -- many of whom have been endorsed by Palin, the de-facto leader of the Tea Party -- are the talk of the current political season. Of all of the cultural and political events that have brought us to this point, perhaps Hillary Clinton's candidacy was the main catalyst. (Would it be too cynical to suggest that Palin wouldn't even be a candidate for vice president were it not for Hillary?)


I don't think it's too cynical at all. When she was first named as McCain's veep, Palin even thanked Hillary (and Geraldine Ferraro) for paving the way.

Take Rebecca Traister's observation on the Democrats' botching of Clinton's historic moment: She laments "the Democratic Party's sluggishness in celebrating the historic achievement of Hillary Clinton, its unwillingness to address the monumental nature of her presidential campaign or to acknowledge the often gender-inflected challenges she'd faced. What John McCain and Sarah Palin had done, brilliantly and terrifyingly, I thought at the time, was to move in on territory -- women, feminism, women's history -- that their opponents had been too reluctant to claim."

That sounds about right to me.

Sadly, the cynicism that John McCain and the Republican Party employed when they nominated Palin to be vice president has only been renewed. As the mainstream GOP has failed to connect with voters, it has engaged in a calculated effort to "turn gender into a selling point," as the LA Times' Doyle McManus puts it. "Republican strategists say female candidates should run well this year, when voters are dissatisfied with incumbents of both parties, because women are, by definition, outsiders; they're not members of the 'old-boys club.' "

For feminists like Valenti, this GOP strategy is nothing more than "an empty rallying call to women who are disdainful of or apathetic to women's rights, who want to make abortion and emergency contraception illegal, who would cut funding to the Violence Against Women Act and who fight same-sex marriage rights."


Of course, there are a lot of women who hold these beliefs. They're women, but they aren't feminists. At the same time, there are liberal women who aren't feminists, either. They might talk the talk, but instead of walking the walk they were drinking the Kool-Aid. We saw plenty of 'em in 2008 and I'm sure we can all name names.

Another question has arisen from Palin and the Tea Party's "feminist" power grab: Is it better to have a debate that is about the defining characteristics of feminism -- like, say, who "belongs" -- than to not have one at all? Says Kate Harding of Jezebel: "One curious thing about this 'new conservative feminism' is that all these women suddenly want to be known as feminists. Like it's a good thing! A desirable thing! A fashionable thing! When did this happen?"

True, "feminism" used to be a very dirty word among conservatives, particularly among fundamentalist Christians. If I were more interested in these Repub women, I would take note of when and where they actually apply the feminist label to themselves. I doubt if they do it when they're courting the family values voters.

__________________

4145952823_2e0edce16f.jpg

Nobody puts THIS baby in the corner!


Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1695
Date:
Permalink  
 

True, "feminism" used to be a very dirty word among conservatives, particularly among fundamentalist Christians. If I were more interested in these Repub women, I would take note of when and where they actually apply the feminist label to themselves. I doubt if they do it when they're courting the family values voters.

Damn Straight!

Palin briefly touched on the f-word tonight on Greta, when asked about the allegation on the internet, and now, on MSM, that Sarah had previously had breast implants.  I had not heard this, but Greta said it was "all over the internet", and had been picked up by main stream news.  My first question would be...WTF? Why is this news worthy?  She also mentioned the fact that News Week had run the pic of Sarah again in the shorts outfit which she wore for "Runners World".

Gretta asked the obvious question... Have the feminists groups taken a stand against such obviously sexist attacks on Palin?  Sarah replied that not a single feminist group had come to her defense or condemned the sexism.

I totally agree that the conservative groups don't truly embrace feminism, I also believe that the so-called feminist groups which failed to condemn the blatant sexism against palin, just as they failed to do when Hillary was the target (as Greta pointed out), don't truly embrace feminism either.




__________________
It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.... Men, their rights and nothing more; women, their rights and nothing less.  ~Susan B. Anthony



SuperModerator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1788
Date:
Permalink  
 

The New Agenda has repeatedly defended Sarah from sexist attacks. It would be nice if she gave them some credit.

__________________

4145952823_2e0edce16f.jpg

Nobody puts THIS baby in the corner!


Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 798
Date:
Permalink  
 

I have defended Sarah against sexism............and will do so for any woman!

__________________


Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1695
Date:
Permalink  
 

totally agree Jen and Bldg. TNA condemns sexism, regardless of the target - unlike NOW, which, under the leadership of Kim Gandy, threw Hillary under the bus.

Sarah should and could give TNA credit. I think she's reluctant to connect herself to any organization that might be considered liberal (which TNA is not) by the conservatives.

JMHO, but Sarah missed a golden opportunity to take a moderate stance, inclusive of mod Dems, Indys, and Pubs. Instead, she has moved increasingly to the right, lke the Tea Party movement, of which she is considered by some to be the unofficial leader.

Like you BLDG, I'll defend her against sexism, but I won't be voting for her again.

__________________
It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.... Men, their rights and nothing more; women, their rights and nothing less.  ~Susan B. Anthony



SuperModerator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1788
Date:
Permalink  
 

I'll defend Sarah against sexist attacks, yet at the same time I don't think she really needs us now; she has the whole Tea Party machine watching her back.

__________________

4145952823_2e0edce16f.jpg

Nobody puts THIS baby in the corner!


Super Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
Permalink  
 

She (Palin) needs, as every female politician needs,  US.   We have to make sure they are treated fairly and equally at all times.  Remember our daughters are our future... and they hear and see everything.  Even if it is just that we don't speak up in our own kitchens anymore and shout out "FOUL" every time we hear and see sexism.  They, our daughters, take note of that change.  We need to be consistent.  We need to make sure the message our daughters, and most importantly sons, hear loud and clear is: sexism is wrong no matter where, no matter when, and no matter who it is directly to.  It's the only way, Mothers, we have the power to shape the next generation in a way no other can.  If we don't speak up.... who will?

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard